Two Sides of the Coin

At one time, death was not an expected end of life. Now being a natural part of temporary existence on earth, we can view it from two sides of the same coin.


As a Christian lay theologian and scholar, C.S. Lewis aligned himself with the Anglican Church. Conversely, he gathered his configurational weave of personal theology from many different forms of theology and philosophy. However, he went well beyond to guarantee nothing he said or wrote countered the Bible. Correctly believing the Bible was immutable and the final word in all things Christian. His love for the Savior came to him slowly but absolutely.

Consequently, he remains the most prevailing Christian thinker of the twentieth century. Lewis’ insights into the relationship between God/ humanity/ and life is extraordinary. He will always stand among the giants of Christian thinkers.

G.W. (All emphases mine)


The Two Hands

On death

On the one hand Death is the triumph of Satan, the punishment of the Fall, and the last enemy. Christ shed tears at the grave of Lazarus and sweated blood in Gethsemane: the Life of Lives that was in Him detested this penal obscenity not less than we do, but more. On the other hand, only he who loses his life will save it. We are baptised into the death of Christ, and it is the remedy for the Fall. Death is, in fact, what some modern people call “ambivalent.” It is Satan’s great weapon and also God’s great weapon: it is holy and unholy; our supreme disgrace and our only hope; the thing Christ came to conquer and the means by which He conquered.

Satan produced human Death. But when God created Man, He gave him such a constitution that, if the highest part of it rebelled against Himself, it would be bound to lose control over the lower parts: i.e., in the long run to suffer Death. This provision may be regarded equally as a punitive sentence (“In the day ye eat of that fruit ye shall die”), as a mercy, and as a safety device.

It is punishment because Death—that Death of which Martha says to Christ, “But . . . Sir . . . it’ll smell”—is horror and ignominy. (“I am not so much afraid of death as ashamed of it,” said Sir Thomas Browne.) It is mercy because by willing and humble surrender to it Man undoes his act of rebellion and makes even this depraved and monstrous mode of Death an instance of that higher and mystical Death which is eternally good and a necessary ingredient in the highest life. “The readiness is all”—not, of course, the merely heroic readiness but that of humility and self-renunciation. Our enemy, so welcomed, becomes our servant: bodily Death, the monster, becomes blessed spiritual Death to self, if the spirit so wills—or rather if it allows the Spirit of the willingly dying God so to will in it.

It is a safety device because, once Man has fallen, natural immortality would be the one utterly hopeless destiny for him. Aided to the surrender that he must make by no external necessity of Death, free (if you call it freedom) to rivet faster and faster about himself through unending centuries the chains of his own pride and lust and of the nightmare civilisations which these build up in ever-increasing power and complication, he would have progressed from being merely a fallen man to being a fiend, possibly beyond all modes of redemption. This danger was averted. The sentence that those who ate of the forbidden fruit would be driven away from the Tree of Life was implicit in the composite nature with which Man was created. But to convert this penal death into the means of eternal life—to add to its negative and preventive function a positive and saving function—it was further necessary that death should be accepted. Humanity must embrace death freely, submit to it with total humility, drink it to the dregs, and so convert it into that mystical death which is the secret of life.

But only a Man who did not need to have been a Man at all unless He had chosen, only one who served in our sad regiment as a volunteer, yet also one who was perfectly a Man, could perform this perfect dying; and thus (which way you put it is unimportant) either defeat Death or redeem it. He tasted death on behalf of all others. He is the representative “Die-er” of the universe: and for that very reason the Resurrection and the Life. Or conversely, because He truly lives, He truly dies, for that is the very pattern of reality. Because the higher can descend into the lower He who from all eternity has been incessantly plunging Himself in the blessed death of self-surrender to the Father can also most fully descend into the horrible and (for us) involuntary death of the body. Because Vicariousness is the very idiom of the reality He has created, His death can become ours.

The whole Miracle, far from denying what we already know of reality, writes the comment which makes that crabbed text plain: or rather, proves itself to be the text on which Nature was only the commentary. In science we have been reading only the notes to a poem; in Christianity we find the poem itself.

From Miracles

Compiled in Words to Live By – C.S. Lewis


Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?” John 11:25-26

Miracles: A Preliminary Study. Copyright 1947 C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. Copyright renewed © 1947 C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. Revised 1960, restored 1996 C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. Used with permission of HarperCollins Publishers. Words to Live By: A Guide for the Merely Christian. Copyright © 2007 by C. S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. Used with permission of HarperCollins Publishers.

7 thoughts on “Two Sides of the Coin”

  1. We’re on the way to the airport, and I know I’m somewhat distracted, so I’ve saved this to go back to. There’s so much depth and I want to be sure and soak it all up. Thank you, G. W., for sharing this most beautiful post!!

    Liked by 2 people

  2. “…He tasted death on behalf of all others. He is the representative “Die-er” of the universe: and for that very reason the Resurrection and the Life. Or conversely, because He truly lives, He truly dies, for that is the very pattern of reality…”
    This is an amazing concept!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. C.S. Lewis couldn’t grasp Jesus being the Son of God. Finally, two Christian friends suggested he stop fighting against the theological concept, relax into Jesus, and experience Him. When he did, he could understand how he wrote it here. That made the difference between accepting a theological concept and experiencing a relationship with the Person of Jesus, our Savior.

      I agree, yes, it is fantastic! Thanks for your comment, Pedro!

      Liked by 1 person

    1. I have read many of C.S. Lewis’ published works. I have taken three online college courses concerning the man, his writing, and his Christianity. And I couldn’t agree with you more, Beth! Thank you!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. On a personal note,

    One thing I gleaned from Lewis’ excerpted treatise on death (above) was on a personal basis. He helped me understand my ambivalence concerning my death when faced with its approach. That is, if I should have the God-given opportunity to think about it. If I don’t go through the door of death, I cannot enter the door to eternal life in Christ. And my salvation in Christ is not complete until I exit one gate and join the other.

    Liked by 1 person


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s